Title
Small- and Large-Stakes Risk Aversion: Implications of Concavity Calibration for Decision Theory
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2006
Abstract
A growing literature reports the conclusions that: (a) expected utility theory does not provide a plausible theory of risk aversion for both small-stakes and large-stakes gambles; and (b) this decision theory should be replaced with an alternative theory characterized by loss aversion. This paper explains that the arguments in previous literature fail to support these conclusions. Either concavity calibration has no general implication for expected utility theory or it has problematic implications for all decision theories that involve concave transformations (utility or value functions) of positive money payoffs, which makes loss aversion irrelevant to the argument.
Recommended Citation
Cox, James and Sadiraj, Vjollca, "Small- and Large-Stakes Risk Aversion:
Implications of Concavity Calibration for Decision Theory" (2006). ExCEN Working Papers. 126.
https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/excen_workingpapers/126
Comments
To learn more about the Andrew Young School of Policy Studies and ExCEN Working Papers Series, visit https://aysps.gsu.edu/ and http://excen.gsu.edu/center/.