Document Type


Publication Date



The St. Petersburg Paradox is one of the oldest challenges of expected value theory. Thus far, explanations of the paradox aim at small probabilities being perceived as zero and the boundedness of utility of the outcome. This paper provides experimental results showing that neither diminishing marginal utility of the outcome nor perception of small probabilities can explain the paradox. We find that even in situations where subjects are risk-seeking, and zeroingout small probabilities supports risk-taking, the St. Petersburg Paradox exists. This indicates that the paradox cannot be resolved by the arguments advanced to date.


To learn more about the Andrew Young School of Policy Studies and ExCEN Working Papers Series, visit and