Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Item

No Such Thing as Collective Goods: The Political Utility of Low Level Civil War in Northern Uganda

Wishart, Alexandra Z.A.
Citations
Altmetric:
Abstract

With the extant work on civil war duration as a starting point, this project uses the Ugandan case to identify and address theoretical aporias in our existing understanding of the determinants of duration. The vast majority of existing work begins with the assumption that the rebel force is the determining factor in the duration of conflict. Challenging this assumption, I argue that civil war duration should be understood as a function of the calculations made by both the rebel units and the established state, a dynamic that has implications for the way in which we think of the preferences of the state. Finally, that incentive structures exist, given the nature of post-colonial states that lower the utility of peace for elected leadership and reduce their willingness to provide peace as a collective good to the broader population as civil war can be used as one of Jeffrey Herbst’s buffer mechanisms.

Comments
Description
Date
2010-10-26
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Civil war duration, Uganda, Social Contract Theory, State creation, Lord’s Resistance Army, Buffer mechanisms
Citation
Wishart, Alexandra Z.A.. "No Such Thing as Collective Goods: The Political Utility of Low Level Civil War in Northern Uganda." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2010. https://doi.org/10.57709/1666501
Embargo Lift Date
2010-11-30
Embedded videos