Loading...
Diversity in Methodology: Different Possibilities for Data Collection, Analysis, and Representation
Stinson, David W. ; Bullock, Erika C.
Stinson, David W.
Bullock, Erika C.
Citations
Altmetric:
Abstract
Mathematics education research over the past half century can be understood as operating in four distinct yet overlapping and simultaneously operating historical moments: the process–product moment (1970s–), the interpretivist–constructivist moment (1980s–), the social-turn moment (mid 1980s–), and the sociopolitical-turn moment (2000s–). Each moment embraces unique theoretical perspectives as it critiques or rejects others. Moreover, because methodology is inextricably linked to theory, each moment calls forth unique methodological perspectives. Using exemplars of research articles from each moment, the authors illustrate how each moment provides different possibilities for data collection, analysis, and representation.
Comments
<p>This article was originally published in: M. Martinez & A. Castro Superfine (Eds.), <a href="http://www.pmena.org/2013/files/PMENA2013_Conference_Proceedings.pdf" title="Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education"><em>Proceedings of the35<sup>th</sup> annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education </em></a>. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois at Chicago.</p>
<p>The version of record is available here with the permission of the authors.</p>
Description
Date
2013-01-01
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
mathematics education research, research methodology, data collection, analysis, representation
Citation
Stinson, D. W., & Bullock, E. C. (2013). Diversity in methodology: Different possibilities for data collection, analysis, and representation. In M. Martinez & A. Castro Superfine (Eds.), <em>Proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1256–1259). Chicago, IL: University of Illinois at Chicago.
