Exploring the Gaps: Healthcare Coverage and Access for Transgender and Gender-Diverse (TGD) Adults in Atlanta, GA
Logan M. Ray
Citations
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This capstone project explores the experience of transgender and gender
diverse (TGD) adults in Atlanta, GA with a focus on navigating healthcare coverage and
accessing affirming, affordable care. This project is a summary report with themes from
findings, policy implications, highlight of community partners providing/modeling quality care,
and a call for future funding for TGD health-related research.
NEED: TGD populations are disproportionately less likely to have adequate healthcare coverage,
a reality worsened when living in a state without traditional Medicaid expansion. Compounding
stressors amplify this gap in care, directly impacted by poor social determinants of health.
Existing literature exploring the relationship between TGD health-related stressors and
outcomes in the South is scarce.
METHODS: Using qualitative methods and Ilan Meyer’s Minority Stress Model, this study
analyzes how minority status and various stressors influence access to health services. Primary
data were collected through virtual interviews with five TGD participants, supported by a
literature review on TGD healthcare inequities in the U.S. South.
FINDINGS: This study identified several barriers to healthcare access for TGD adults in Atlanta,
Georgia. Key findings include widespread bureaucratic hurdles, such as insurance denials and
provider gatekeeping; negative provider experiences stemming from a lack of cultural
competency; and internalized stressors related to core beliefs about identity and care-seeking.
Participants highlighted social determinants of health inequities around employment
discrimination, social and community environments, lack of affirming mental health support,
and limited health literacy.
PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATION: Existing literature and project findings highlight a severe need
for supportive infrastructure at the local, state, and federal levels. Public health institutions
must focus on strengthening support by prioritizing funding for community-led interventions
and prioritization of TGD input and voice.
