Date of Award
Summer 8-13-2013
Degree Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
Philosophy
First Advisor
Dr. Andrew Altman
Second Advisor
Dr. Andrew I. Cohen
Third Advisor
Dr. Andrew J. Cohen
Abstract
Thomas Pogge proposes the Health Impact Fund (HIF) as a realistic, feasible reform to the pharmaceutical patent regime that would incentivize pharmaceutical research and reward innovation for medicines based on their impact on the global burden of disease. Pogge advances a human rights-based argument to show that the HIF is a morally required addition to the current pharmaceutical patent regime. One objection to his human rights argument comes from a libertarian appeal to property rights. Pogge’s response to the libertarian leads to the counterintuitive conclusion that libertarianism is incompatible with any system of intellectual property rights. This paper will show how Pogge fails to distinguish between what I call status quo and revisionist libertarian positions on intellectual property. Making this distinction, I maintain, would strengthen the human rights argument and allow Pogge to avoid the counterintuitive conclusion of his response to the libertarian.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57709/4161684
Recommended Citation
Hopper, Zachary, "Thomas Pogge And The Two Types Of Libertarian." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2013.
doi: https://doi.org/10.57709/4161684