Author ORCID Identifier

0009-0000-2009-3310

Date of Award

Spring 5-6-2024

Degree Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Department

Sociology

First Advisor

Dr. Wendy Simonds

Second Advisor

Dr. Ralph LaRossa

Third Advisor

Dr. Katie Acosta

Abstract

Current literature suggests that we have, at best, a muddled understanding of consent. Recent studies have suggested that the current discussion of consent found online relies on the power of capitalism and the state to re-define the term, leaving already marginalized groups vulnerable to persecution and prosecution. To better understand the conversation around consent, I analyze language employed in the comments on Reddit and NYT posts about six male celebrities accused of sexual assault. To capture any change in this language over time, I selected cases from both before and after #MeToo, specifically those involving Bill Clinton, Clarence Thomas, Harvey Weinstein, R. Kelly, Aziz Ansari, and Louis C.K. I found some shifts in the discourse around consent – mainly a move from earlier legalistic interpretations of the word to a broader, more complex understanding of consent, post-#MeToo. However, I did not identify a consensus definition, instead finding that individuals operated largely based on their own definitions. I present here some distinct ways in which commenters spoke about consent. Ultimately, we still lack a clear, agreed upon definition of the term, making it difficult at times for constructive conversation.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.57709/36969149

File Upload Confirmation

1

Available for download on Sunday, April 26, 2026

Share

COinS