Date of Award

Summer 8-7-2024

Degree Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Department

Sociology

First Advisor

Eric R. Wright

Second Advisor

Raeda K. Anderson

Third Advisor

Daniel Pasciuti

Fifth Advisor

Donald Reitzes

Abstract

Enduring sociological research demonstrates the utility of personal networks for individual outcomes, indicating that discussions are critical to managing personal problems. Yet, we continue to know little about what actually happens in discussion networks. To address this, I developed a novel method that captures problem-specific networks and measures their overlap. Using originally collected data on the personal networks of emerging adults, this dissertation evaluates discussion patterns and their associations with depression. There are three principal findings. First, problem networks are formed around primary appraisals, not content domains. Second, the degree to which discussants overlap also varies by primary appraisals. Challenges (potential for gain) are comprised of specialized and segmented discussants, while threats (potential for loss) and harms (actual harm) are situated in overlapping networks. Third, large social responses to problems—more discussants—are associated with less severe depression. These findings suggest that discussion practices that match rather than provide access to resources are an important mechanism that links discussing problems with mental health. The benefits of personal networks for mental health among emerging adults may operate primarily through a matching mechanism driven by cognitive appraisals with specialized and segmented discussants.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.57709/37425159

File Upload Confirmation

1

Available for download on Friday, July 31, 2026

Share

COinS