Date of Award
Spring 5-9-2016
Degree Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
Philosophy
First Advisor
Dr. Andrew Altman
Second Advisor
Dr. Sandra Dwyer
Third Advisor
Dr. Sebastian Rand
Abstract
The jurist Carl Schmitt’s views on the total state and race need further clarification as long as the English language edition of his Concept of the Political presents an apologist commentary. The questions are to which degree Schmitt’s works written during the Weimar Republic are tainted with totalitarian and racist ideas and whether Schmitt gave up fundamental principles during Nationalist Socialism. This thesis examines writings by Schmitt between 1913 and 1940 to reconstruct a coherent anti-individualistic legal viewpoint and its arguments. The first part finds that Schmitt undermines the individual rights of the Weimar Constitution. The second part discusses Schmitt’s role as a theorist of totalitarianism. The third part considers Schmitt’s anti-Semitism as underlying motivation for his political theory and analyzes his racism in light of his anti-individualism. Schmitt frequently argues by invoking necessity of history and by justifying some political action as necessary. These arguments should be rejected.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57709/8475685
Recommended Citation
Imbsweiler, Eva, "Individualism, the Total State and Race in the Views of Carl Schmitt." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2016.
doi: https://doi.org/10.57709/8475685