Date of Award

Spring 5-6-2012

Degree Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Department

Biology

First Advisor

Sarah. L. Pallas

Abstract

Brain injury is a serious clinical problem. The success of recovery from brain injury involves functional compensation in the affected brain area. We are interested in general mechanisms that underlie compensatory plasticity after brain damage, particularly when multiple brain areas or multiple modalities are included. In this thesis, I studied the function of auditory cortex after recovery from neonatal midbrain damage as a model system that resembles patients with brain damage or sensory dysfunction. I addressed maladaptive changes of auditory cortex after invasion by ectopic visual inputs. I found that auditory cortex contained auditory, visual, and multisensory neurons after it recovered from neonatal midbrain damage (Mao et al. 2011). The distribution of these different neuronal responses did not show any clustering or segregation. As might be predicted from the fact that auditory neurons and visual neurons were intermingled throughout the entire auditory cortex, I found that residual auditory tuning and tonotopy in the rewired auditory cortex were compromised. Auditory tuning curves were broader and tonotopic maps were disrupted in the experimental animals. Because lateral inhibition is proposed to contribute to refinement of sensory maps and tuning of receptive fields, I tested whether loss of inhibition is responsible for the compromised auditory function in my experimental animals. I found an increase rather than a decrease of inhibition in the rewired auditory cortex, suggesting that broader tuning curves in the experimental animals are not caused by loss of lateral inhibition.

These results suggest that compensatory plasticity can be maladaptive and thus impair the recovery of the original sensory cortical function. The reorganization of brain areas after recovery from brain damage may require stronger inhibition in order to process multiple sensory modalities simultaneously. These findings provide insight into compensatory plasticity after sensory dysfunction and brain damage and new information about the role of inhibition in cross-modal plasticity. This study can guide further research on design of therapeutic strategies to encourage adaptive changes and discourage maladaptive changes after brain damage, sensory/motor dysfunction, and deafferentation.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.57709/2767743

Download

Share

COinS