Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-1-2008
Abstract
Expected value theory has been known for centuries to be subject to critique by St. Petersburg paradox arguments. And there is a traditional rebuttal of the critique that denies the empirical relevance of the paradox because of its apparent dependence on existence of credible offers to pay unbounded sums of money. Neither critique nor rebuttal focus on the question with empirical relevance: Do people make choices in bounded St. Petersburg games that are consistent with expected value theory? This paper reports an experiment that addresses that question.
Recommended Citation
Cox, James; Sadiraj, Vjollca; and Vogt, Bodo, "On the Empirical Relevance of St. Petersburg Lotteries" (2008). ExCEN Working Papers. 103.
https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/excen_workingpapers/103
Comments
To learn more about the Andrew Young School of Policy Studies and ExCEN Working Papers Series, visit https://aysps.gsu.edu/ and http://excen.gsu.edu/center/.