Date of Award
12-4-2006
Degree Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
Philosophy
First Advisor
Eddy Nahmias - Chair
Second Advisor
Sandra Dwyer
Third Advisor
Andrea Scarantino
Abstract
One common element of Kripke’s and Chalmers’ reactions to physicalist theories of mind is their reliance upon the intuition that concepts about conscious experiences are essentially identified by the “immediate phenomenal quality” of the conscious experience, how the experience feels from the subjective point of view. I examine how Kripke’s and Chalmers’ critiques require that concepts about conscious experiences be identified by their subjective feel and then move on to provide some ways in which this intuition about concepts of conscious experience could be wrong. Specifically, the intuition is not consistent with our intuitions about unusual cases reported by pain researchers and does not take such cases to be genuine cases of pain. These inconsistencies weaken the intuition, making it problematic for any critique of identity theory or physicalism to rely heavily upon it.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57709/1059750
Recommended Citation
Owensby-Sandifer, Jessica Rae, "Kripke, Chalmers and the Immediate Phenomenal Quality of Pain." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2006.
doi: https://doi.org/10.57709/1059750