Date of Award
8-2022
Degree Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
Philosophy
First Advisor
Eric E. Wilson
Second Advisor
Sebastian Rand
Abstract
Hume believes it is common and natural for people to have preferences for character traits similar to their own, but he remains silent on how to separate the innocent preferences from the blameworthy ones. This paper looks to Hume's morality to answer this question, ultimately arguing for two jointly sufficient criteria: 1) a preference is innocent so long as it doesn’t prevent one from adopting the general point of view and 2) a preference is innocent so long as it is not met with disapproval from a spectator viewing it from the general point of view. I argue that these criteria leave most preferences unscathed, and this result highlights a distinctive pluralism in Hume. I consider the ramifications for this pluralism and argue that it gives Hume’s morality an appeal over more rigid moral theories. I conclude by considering the challenge of factionalism that arises from my interpretation.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57709/29454444
Recommended Citation
Masood, Shaharyar, "Innocent Preferences in Hume's Morality." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2022.
doi: https://doi.org/10.57709/29454444
File Upload Confirmation
1