Date of Award
Spring 2-24-2011
Degree Type
Closed Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
Philosophy
First Advisor
Andrew I. Cohen
Second Advisor
Christie Hartley
Third Advisor
William Edmundson
Fourth Advisor
Andrew Altman
Abstract
Richard Joyce claims sincerely uttering moral claims necessarily commits the moral claimant to endorsing false beliefs regarding the predication of nonexistent (non-)natural moral properties. For Joyce, any proposition containing a subject, x, saddled with the predicate “…is moral”[1] will have a truth-value of ‘false’, so long as the predicate fails to refer to anything real in the world. Furthermore, given the philosophical community’s present state of epistemic ignorance, we lack sufficient evidence to justify our endorsement of the existence of (non-)natural moral properties purportedly capable of serving as truth-makers for moral claims. My thesis offers a defense of Joyce’s moral error theory against two different lines of criticisms proffered by Russ Shafer-Landau—one conceptual in nature, and the other ontological. I argue that available evidence compels the informed agnostic about moral truth to suspend judgment on the matter, if not endorse Joyce’s stronger thesis that all moral claims are false.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57709/2069068
Recommended Citation
Hirsch, Kyle M. Mr., "A Defense of Moral Error Theory." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2011.
doi: https://doi.org/10.57709/2069068