Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2010
Abstract
We examine variations in nongovernmental organizations' (NGOs') responses to post-2001 changes in counterterrorism regulations in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Japan. We connect the presence of different ideal type responses—hiding, shirking, vocal opposition, participating, and litigating—to the extent of change in regulations, the degree of uncertainty (and risk) created by new regulations, and the availability of political institutions for NGO participation in policy-making.
Recommended Citation
Bloodgood, Elizabeth, and Joannie Tremblay-Boire. 2010. “NGO Responses to Counterterrorism Regulations after September 11th.” International Journal of Not-For-Profit Law 12.4: 5-19.
Comments
Originally published in:
Bloodgood, Elizabeth, and Joannie Tremblay-Boire. 2010. “NGO Responses to Counterterrorism Regulations after September 11th.” International Journal of Not-For-Profit Law 12.4: 5-19.
http://www.icnl.org/research/journal/vol12iss4/special_1.htm
Posted with the permission of the publisher.